Technology Out Of Science
One obvious argument may be that so as to say something ethically meaningful about new technologies, one needs specialized and detailed knowledge of a specific expertise. Moreover such subfields enable interaction with relevant non-philosophical specialists in for instance legislation, psychology, economic system, science and expertise research (STS) or expertise evaluation (TA). On the opposite aspect, it may be argued that lots could be discovered from interaction and discussion between ethicists specializing in several applied sciences, and a fruitful interaction with the two different strands mentioned above (cultural and political approaches and engineering ethics). Currently, such interaction in lots of instances seems absent, although there are in fact exceptions. Obviously the establishment of such new fields of moral reflection is a response to social and technological developments.
Does Science Drive Technology? Why Or Why Not?
The zoologist John R. Baker criticised this “Bernalistic” view, defending a “liberal” conception of science in accordance with which “the advancement of information by scientific analysis has a value as an end in itself”. Scientists usually justify their work using these and comparable arguments–at present linked to private well being and longer life expectancies, technological development, economic profits, and/or sustainability–to be able to safe funding and acquire social acceptance. They level out that many of the tools, applied sciences and medicines we use right now are products or by-products of analysis, from pens to rockets and from aspirin to organ transplantation. This progressive software of scientific data is captured in Isaac Asimov’s … Read More
